You'll get invited to our Meetups as soon as they're scheduled!
The Miami Photography Meetup Group Message Board › Why Your Camera Does Not Matter by Ken Rockwell - EXCELLENT ARTICLE
| Tom Schaefer | |
|
|
http://kenrockwell.co... Snips from his article: "Cameras don't take pictures, photographers do. Cameras are just another artist's tool. Why is it that even though everyone knows that Photoshop can be used to take any bad image and turn it into a masterpiece, that even after hours of massaging these images look worse than when one started? Maybe because it's entirely an artist's eye, patience and skill that makes an image and not his tools. Even Ansel said "The single most important component of a camera is the twelve inches behind it." A camera catches your imagination. No imagination, no photo - just crap. The word "image" comes from the word "imagination." It doesn't come come from "lens sharpness" or "noise levels." David LaChapelle's work is all about his imagination, not his camera. Setting up these crazy shots is the hard part. Once set up, any camera could catch them. Give me David LaChapelle's camera and I won't get anything like he does, even if you give me the same star performers. " and "Just about any camera, regardless of how good or bad it is, can be used to create outstanding photographs for magazine covers, winning photo contests and hanging in art galleries. The quality of a lens or camera has almost nothing do with the quality of images it can be used to produce." and "Your equipment DOES NOT affect the quality of your image. The less time and effort you spend worrying about your equipment the more time and effort you can spend creating great images. The right equipment just makes it easier, faster or more convenient for you to get the results you need." "Any good modern lens is corrected for maximum definition at the larger stops. Using a small stop only increases depth..." Ansel Adams, June 3, 1937, in a reply to Edward Weston asking for lens suggestions, page 244 of Ansel's autobiography. Ansel made fantastically sharp images seventy years ago without wasting time worrying about how sharp his lenses were. With seventy years of improvement we're far better off concentrating on making stunning photos than photographing test charts. Of course these large format lenses of the 1930s and today are slow, about f/5.6 typically. Small format and digital lenses work best at about 2 stops down. Buying new gear will NOT improve your photography. For decades I thought "if I only had that new lens" that all my photo wants would be satisfied. Nope. I still want that "one more lens," and I've been shooting for over 30 years. There is always one more lens. Get over it. See "The Station" by Robert J. Hastings, as published in "Dear Abby" in 1999, for a better explanation. The camera's only job is to get out of the way of making photographs." |
| al | |
|
|
its the artist, not the crayon, that draws and makes art......
similiarly, its the minds eye of the photographer that makes a photo happen, NOT THE CAMERA..... its why anyone else with my camera can NOT do what I do with it, not remotely. my last girlfriend stated one day," I'ma buy one just like yours and do great pics too!", so I let her try and every one of her photos had at LEAST a head cut off. She claimed I rigged it to not work for her..... the camera only does one thing: absorb light. what light, where light, which light, how light, etc., it has zero concept of. |